The Las Vegas Police Protective Association recently closed a poll asking its members to consider the possibility of a strike, although such an action could be deemed illegal under Nevada state law. While the union president, Steve Grammas, mentioned ongoing negotiations with the Metropolitan Police Department, no details were provided on the potential outcomes or whether the union will release the poll results.
The union has been advocating for pay adjustments to counterbalance an upcoming increase in the contribution rate to the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS), which will affect both police and fire employees. This increase is set to begin on July 19. Under the current collective bargaining agreement, any changes in contribution rates must be equally shared between employees and employers.
The poll offered members four options regarding their response to the situation, including the possibility of a strike, utilizing sick leave en masse, refusing to leave the briefing room, or accepting the changes without protest. However, Nevada law categorizes services like policing as essential, prohibiting public safety employees from striking. In the event of a strike, the law allows for severe penalties, including fines and potential imprisonment for union leaders.
The union’s actions and the potential for a strike have drawn comparisons to past labor disputes in Nevada, such as those involving the Clark County School District. Public sentiment and support could play a crucial role in the union’s ability to achieve its objectives, despite legal constraints.
James Strade
June 29, 2025 at 5:30 pmYou agreed to split the cost of a raise in PERS so do it. You just got a big raise in benefits from Social Security. DONT DO ANYTHING STUPID!!